Showing posts with label Lherzolite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lherzolite. Show all posts

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Horoman peridotite (lherzolite) - full thin section

 For a general description of the Horoman peridotite body, see the post of July 2, 2013: "Horoman Peridotite ... - olivine microfabfric".

This image shows a full thin section of Horoman peridotite. The 29-mm long dimension is actually shorter than a typical thin section, which is usually between 38 mm and 42 mm. The coarse texture of the peridotite is evident in this image. For example, the large olivine grain just left of center is about 10 mm in length. Most of the olivine grains are strained, as indicated by their banded coloration (deformation banding). The pyroxene grains also show deformation banding, but much less obviously than the olivine.

FULL THIN SECTION
Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Horoman peridotite (lherzolite), Hokkaido, Japan. Full thin section, XPL macrophotograph. Brightly-colored grains are olivine; gray grains are pyroxenes. Smaller, rounded brown grains are symplectite nodules. Imaged area approximately 21 mm by 29 mm.



REFERENCES

Niida,  K., (1975), Textures and Olivine Fabrics of the Horoman Ultramafic Rocks, Japan; Jour. Japan. Assoc. Min. Petr. Econ, Geol.; 70, p. 265-285. (In English with Japanese abstract)

Niida, K., (1984), Petrology of the Horoman Ultramafic Rocks in the Hidaka Metamorphic Belt, Hokkaido, Japan, Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 4, Geology and mineralogy, 21(2):197-250. (In English)

Niida, K.,  and Takazawa, E. (2007), Origin of Layering observed in the Horoman Peridotite Complex, Japan, Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 113:Supplement, p. 167-184. (In Japanese except for some of the figure labels)

Sawaguchi, T., (2004), Deformation history and exhumation process of the Horoman Peridotite Complex, Hokkaido, Japan. Tectonophysics, 379, p. 109-126. (In English)

Takahashi, N., (1991), Origin of three peridotite suites from the Horoman peridotite complex, Hokkaido, Japan; Melting, melt segregation, and solidification processes in the upper mantle; Jour. Min.Petr. Econ. Geol.,  86: p. 199-215. (In English) 


Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Horoman peridotite - compositional layering

For a general description of the Horoman peridotite body, see the post of July 2, 2013: "Horoman Peridotite ... - olivine microfabfric".

As shown on the map by Niida (1974) the rocks of the Horoman peridotite body are mainly plagioclase lherzolite, lherzolite, and dunite, as well as small amounts of gabbro and pyroxenite. Interlayered plagioclase lherzolite and dunite account for almost all of the bedrock surface in the northern three-quarters of the body, from south of Mt. Apoi to north of Mt. Pinneshiri, a distance of about seven kilometers. Thus, these two rock types dominate the lithology of the body. The remaining southern one-quarter of the surface is mainly interlayered lherzolite and dunite. You can download Prof. Niida's 1984 paper, including the dramatic geological map, from: http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2115/36729  This will take you to the abstract of Dr. Niida's paper in HUSCAP, Hokkaido University Scholarly and Academic Papers. To download the entire PDF (11.4 mb), click  the "View/Open" box. The map is on the fourth page (page 200).



Compositional layering in the upper zone of the Horoman peridotite complex.
This is the best picture of layering in the Horoman complex that I have seen. If
you have a better one, send it to me and I'll post it. If you happen to be the man
in the photograph, please let me know so I can identify you.
Photo: geomantleh1 via lherzharz1.exblog.jp


text


University students on a field trip in the Horoman peridotite complex. Layering is clearly
visible in the fallen rock at right. Photo: geomantleh1 via lherzharz1.exblog.jp



text

REFERENCES

Niida, K., (1974), Structure of the Horoman Massif of the Hidaka Metamorphic Belt, Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 80:1, p. 31-44. (In English)

Niida, K., (1984), Petrology of the Horoman Ultramafic Rocks in the Hidaka Metamorphic Belt, Hokkaido, Japan, Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 4, Geology and mineralogy, 21(2):197-250. (In English)

Niida, K.,  and Takazawa, E. (2007), Origin of Layering observed in the Horoman Peridotite Complex, Japan, Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 113:Supplement, p. 167-184. (In Japanese except for some of the figure labels)

Takahashi, N., (1991), Origin of three peridotite suites from the Horoman peridotite complex, Hokkaido, Japan; Melting, melt segregation, and solidification processes in the upper mantle; Jour. Min.Petr. Econ. Geol.,  86: p. 199-215. (In English)





Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Horoman peridotite (lherzolite), Hokkaido, Japan - olivine microfabric

The Horoman peridotite complex is located in south-central Hokkaido, about 180 kilometers southeast of Sapporo, near the small coastal town of Samani (See post of April 29, 2011: "The Town that Loves Peridotites"). The layered, gently warped peridotite body crops out over an area of approximately 8 km by 10 km, with a thickness of about 3.7 km (Sawaguchi, 2004). It is the largest ultramafic body in Japan and, because it is only weakly serpentinized, it is one of the largest relatively fresh peridotite bodies exposed on land anywhere in the world.

The Horoman complex is situated at the southern extremity of the 140-km-long Hidaka metamorphic belt, following the Hidaka mountain chain, which extends southward from the Ishikari mountain massif at the center of the island of Hokkaido. Although there are six other major ultramafic complexes lying along the Hidaka metamorphic belt, they are all much smaller than the Horoman complex. Since the 1970's, the geology of the Horoman complex has been studied intensively, and there is now a substantial body of literature on the subject.

The highest peaks within the Horoman exposure area are M. Pinneshiri, at 968 meters, and Mt. Apoi (Apoi-dake), at 811 meters. The topography is rugged, and from Mt. Apoi the land surface drops to sea level in less than 3 kilometers, an average slope of 15 degrees. However, as is evident in the photograph below, slopes are much steeper toward the top of the mountain ridge.

Looking from Mt. Apoi toward Mt. Pinneshiri, along the ridge-line through the Horoman peridotite complex.
Photo by geomantleh1           via www.lherzharz1.exblog.jp/


text

Geology students from five Japanese universities at a dunite outcop along the Horoman River.
Photo by geomantleh1           via www.lherzharz1.exblog.jp/

The complex is in fault contact with a gabbro layer on the west, which separates it from unmetamorphosed sedimentary rocks. On the north, east, and south, the complex is in fault contact with schists, gneisses, and hornfels. The Horoman peridotite was initially formed in the upper mantle in the late Proterozoic, about 830 Ma. It was then exhumed to the plagioclase stability field, and later subducted to the garnet stability field in the upper mantle. A second generation of partial melting took place in the Cretaceous (~80 Ma), when a collision of two arc-trench systems created the Hidaka metamorphic belt. The body finally ascended upward again in the Miocene (~23 Ma), from the mantle to the crust, where it re-equilibrated in the spinel stability field.

At least three characteristics of the Horoman complex are somewhat unusual. First, there is  well-developed compositional layering throughout the body (Niida, 1974; Niida and Takazawa, 2007); Second, abundant spinel-plagioclase and spinel-pyroxene symplectite nodules occur in several of the peridotite layers (Morishita, 2000; Morishita and Arai, 2003); and third, there are three commingling types of olivine fabric in the peridotite (Niida, 1975). This post deals with the last-named characteristic.

The three types of olivine fabric identified by Niida (1975) are:
1. Primary olivine in large grains, often sheared or strained (image directly below).
2. Polygonal olivine grains, recrystallized (second image below).
3. Fine aggregates resulting from cataclasis and mylonitization (third image below).

Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Large primary olivine grain, recrystallized and showing deformation banding.
XPL digital mosaic. Imaged area approximately 4.8 mm by 5.5 mm.


Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
"Polygonal" (subhedral) olivine inclusion in orthopyroxene. XPL.
Imaged area 1.3 mm by 1.7 mm.

t
Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Fine olivine aggregate created by cataclasis and mylonization. XPL.
Imaged area 2.7 mm by 4 mm.


REFERENCES

Morishita, T., 2000, Three-dimensional Microstructure of Symplectite Minerals in the Horoman Peridotite: A preliminary Analysis; Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 106:11, p. 800-811. (In English with Japanese abstract)

Morishita, T., and Arai, S., (2003), Evolution of spinel–pyroxene symplectite in spinel–lherzolites from the Horoman Complex, Japan; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol; 144, p. 509-22. (In English)

Niida, K., (1974), Structure of the Horoman Massif of the Hidaka Metamorphic Belt, Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 80:1, p. 31-44. (In English)

Niida,  K., (1975), Textures and Olivine Fabrics of the Horoman Ultramafic Rocks, Japan; Jour. Japan. Assoc. Min. Petr. Econ, Geol.; 70, p. 265-285. (In English with Japanese abstract)

Niida, K.,  and Takazawa, E. (2007), Origin of Layering observed in the Horoman Peridotite Complex, Japan, Jour. Geol Soc. Japan; 113:Supplement, p. 167-184. (In Japanese except for some of the figure labels)

Takahashi, N., (1991), Origin of three peridotite suites from the Horoman peridotite complex, Hokkaido, Japan; Melting, melt segregation, and solidification processes in the upper mantle; Jour. Min.Petr. Econ. Geol.,  86: p. 199-215. (In English)

Sawaguchi, T., (2004), Deformation history and exhumation process of the Horoman Peridotite Complex, Hokkaido, Japan. Tectonophysics, 379, p. 109-126. (In English)

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Mantle lherzolite xenolith in basalt - full thin section.

Click on image to enlarge.           Photo © Daniel R. Snyder

Spinel lherzolite xenolith, San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. Lherzolite is at left; brightly colored grains are olivine, gray and brown grains are pyroxene.  Felty-textured basalt is at right. XPL macrophotograph. Imaged area 21 mm x 34 mm. Click on the image to enlarge. It's a lot more interesting close up!

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Mantle xenolith - reflected-light photomicrograph

Click on image to enlarge.         Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Light green olivine , olive-green enstatite, and emerald-green chromian diopside in a Cr-diopside lherzolite xenolith. I'm leaning toward calling the curved, dark grain in the center spinel. This is, after all, a spinel lherzolite, and in such rocks spinel is usually near pyroxenes. San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. Reflected-light photomicrograph of polished section. Imaged area 2.7 mm x 4 mm.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene (diopside) in lherzolite

Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Pale yellow grains are pyroxenes. Lower pyroxene grain is orthopyroxene, upper grain (actually several contiguous smaller grains) is clinopyroxene. When the stage was rotated, the orthopyroxene grain showed parallel extinction, the clinopyroxene grain - inclined extinction. However, there is also a morphological difference in this case: the orthopyroxene grain has a more regular, parallel cleavage pattern, while the clinopyroxene  has shorter, curving, and kinked cleavage cracks. Bright-colored grains are olivine, black areas are grains at extinction and voids. Cr-diopside lherzolite mantle xenolith. San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. XPL. Imaged area 1.3 mm x 2 mm.

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Lherzolite xenolith in basalt

Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Felty material at top is basalt, bright colored grains are olivine, large pale yellow grain is orthopyroxene. Spinel Lherzolite mantle xenolith in basalt, San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. XPL. Imaged area 1.3 mm x 2 mm.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Mantle lherzolite xenolith in basalt - closeup of hand sample

Click on image to enlarge.          Photo © Daniel R. Snyder
Closeup of hand sample of mantle peridotite shown in previous post. Basalt has enclosed a small block of peridotite (bottom center) as well as the larger block (top), of which only a portion is included in the hand sample. Basalt is gray, olivine is light green, orthopyroxene is olive green, clinopyroxene is emeral green, spinel is dark gray-brown. Note that there is almost no reaction zone between the peridotite and the basalt. San Carlos Indian Reservation, Arizona. Scale in centimeters.

In the 1960's, amid speculation as to the composition of the mantle, Ringwood (1966)* developed the concept of a non-specific olivine-pyroxene rock which he named "pyrolite". To avoid the ongoing debate about mineral composition, pyrolite was to be defined in chemical terms, such that a material with the agreed-upon bulk chemistry would meet the requirements of density (as inferred from seismic data) and of minor elements necessary to conform to the composition of magmas that were thought to be derived from partial melting of the mantle. Different pyrolite models were proposed by several workers, and synthetic pyrolite was produced. Ringwood (1986)* produced a diagram of the mineral assemblages, densities, and phase transformations displayed by pyrolite from a depth of 100 kilometers to 850 kilometers.

Although Ringwood was widely respected and had a number of colleagues and followers, he also had detractors. One of these was Don Anderson, who refuted the concept of pyrolite on several grounds. His main objections were that the pyrolite model did not  adequately address trace elements and isotopes, or evidence for mantle heterogeneity. He also pointed out that materials of made up of different proportions of major elements could satisfy the density requirements, and criticized supporters of the pyrolite model for making ad hoc changes to the definitions as they went along. Anderson favored a dominant role for eclogite in the mantle. His main concessions were to acknowledge that "the mantle between about 800 km and 2600 km appears to be relatively homogeneous" and that "it appears that MgO and SiO2 in approximately equal molar proportions are implied for the lower mantle" (Anderson, 1989)*.

A.E. Ringwood died in 1993. Don L. Anderson published The New Theory of the Earth in 2007**. It repeats verbatim much of the of the earlier edition, but without most of the invective against the pyrolite advocates.


*Anderson, Don L., (1989), Theory of the Earth, Blackwell, 353 p.
**Anderson, Don L., (2007), New Theory of the Earth, Cambridge University Press, 384 p.
*Ringwood, A.E., (1966), Mineralogy of the mantle, in P. M. Hurley (ed.), Advances in the Earth Sciences, MIT Press.
*Ringwood, A.E., (1986), Constitution and evolution of the mantle, Proceedings of the 4th International Kimberlite Conference, v. 2.  Geological Society of Australia.